Post by yamanhosen5657 on Mar 6, 2024 3:26:29 GMT -7
Say you want to use an AI tool to generate financial advice—or worse, medical advice—and publish it on a popular website. Well, then you should probably be pretty careful, right? AIs can "hallucinate" or make things up that sound true, even if they aren't, and it would be pretty bad form to mislead your audience. CNET found this out the hard way. Of 77 AI-written financial stories it published, it had to issue corrections for 41 of them. While we don't know if anyone was actually misled by the stories, the problem is they could have been. CNET is—or was—a reputable brand, so the things it publishes on its website have some weight. And it's the same if you're planning to just use AIs for your own enjoyment. If you're creating a few images with DALL·E 2 to show to your friend, there isn't a lot to worry about.
On the other hand, if you're entering art contests or trying to get published in magazines, you need to step back and consider things carefully. All this is to say that, while we can talk about some of the ethical Panama mobile number list issues with artificial intelligence in the abstract, not every situation is the same. The higher the risks of harm, the more you need to consider whether allowing AI tools to operate unsupervised is advisable. In many cases, with the current tools we have available, it won't be. The potential for deception Generative AI tools can be incredibly useful and powerful, and you should always disclose when you use them. Erring on the side of caution and making sure everyone knows that an AI is generating something mitigates a lot of the potential harms.
First up, if you commit to telling people when you use AI, you make it impossible to, say, cheat on an assignment with ChatGPT. Similarly, you can't turn in AI-generated work to your clients without them being aware it's happening. Second, if you tell people you're using AI, then they can use their judgment to assess what it says. One of the biggest issues with tools like ChatGPT is that it states everything with the same authority and certainty, whether it's true or not. If someone knows that there may be factual or reasoning errors, they can look out for them. Finally, lying is bad. Don't do it.
On the other hand, if you're entering art contests or trying to get published in magazines, you need to step back and consider things carefully. All this is to say that, while we can talk about some of the ethical Panama mobile number list issues with artificial intelligence in the abstract, not every situation is the same. The higher the risks of harm, the more you need to consider whether allowing AI tools to operate unsupervised is advisable. In many cases, with the current tools we have available, it won't be. The potential for deception Generative AI tools can be incredibly useful and powerful, and you should always disclose when you use them. Erring on the side of caution and making sure everyone knows that an AI is generating something mitigates a lot of the potential harms.
First up, if you commit to telling people when you use AI, you make it impossible to, say, cheat on an assignment with ChatGPT. Similarly, you can't turn in AI-generated work to your clients without them being aware it's happening. Second, if you tell people you're using AI, then they can use their judgment to assess what it says. One of the biggest issues with tools like ChatGPT is that it states everything with the same authority and certainty, whether it's true or not. If someone knows that there may be factual or reasoning errors, they can look out for them. Finally, lying is bad. Don't do it.